The Ethical Behavior and Decision Making Within An Organization Essay

The Ethical Behavior and Decision Making Within An Organization - judge ExampleIn my earlier submission, I evinced devotion to the utilitarian ethics as per which those actions atomic number 18 decisions are considered to be respectable that accrue maximal bene explosion to the maximum number of people, while allowing for the optimal and cost-efficient utilization of resources. However, over this semester I realized that as my innate understanding of ethics evolved and matured, I reason that no ethical dogma or principle happens to be a one size fit all dictums. The utilitarian ethics which profess to be sacrosanct in one particular speckle may turn out to be problematic in some another mass situation. For instance, during national socialist Germany, the Jews were persecuted and killed because the regime of the time strongly believed that such actions intended to bring happiness to the majority of the Germans. However, in retrospect, nil harbors the doubt that such actions wer e not only evil but a viable source of abash for the entire humanity. Such examples forced me to think as to what does it mean by being ethical? Is at that place a single ethical dogma that fits and suits all the situations? After much brain raking, I came to the last that my idea of ethics stood to be more in consonance with the theory of situational ethics. Eventually what is right and what is wrong, what is ethical and what is unethical depends upon the nature of a particular situation. There exists nothing as universal ethics and all(prenominal) situation has its own ethical norms imminent to it. What is considered to be ethically right may be totally incongruent and inapplicable in a particular situation? Hence, while taking ethical decisions, a leader needs to be amply flexible and open-minded. This does not mean that such an approach mustiness be pliable and open to manipulation. Yet, the ultimate ethical credentials of a leader ought to be dependent on ones ability to opt for the nobler hypothesis amongst the available choices. For instance, if as a passenger vehicle I fire an employee because ones services are not in tandem with the organizational expectations, it would be ethical. However, if I fire an employee because he has not been able to muster his best, as he has a wife suffering from cancer and he needs to take care of his two kids at home, it would be unethical. The nobler choice in this situation will be to extend the options and possibilities to that employee, which allows him to serve the organization while taking care of his domestic responsibilities. I also need to mention that the ethical entertains to which I owed allegiance to earlier, which are rightfulness, honesty, charity, and responsibility still stand to be more or less the same. However, the way I perceive and understand these values have indeed achieved much maturity and human consideration. For instance, the value of integrity requires an employee to safeguard org anizational information and secrets. Yet, if the imperative of integrity makes a person to safeguard such organizational information, the withholding of which amounts to cheating the customers and shareholders, then safeguarding such information will be totally contrary to the value of integrity. The same stands to be true for the other three values.